PhillyTalk.com
  • Home
  • Philly Slang
  • Healthy Diet
  • Blog
  • Talk Radio
  • Audio Vault
  • Funny Stuff
  • Site Info
  • Web & Tech
  • Search
  • Introduction
  • Intermittent Fasting
  • Foods
  • Recipes
  • Products
  • Sleep | Lighting
  • Health Videos
  • Articles
  • Remembering 9/11
  • Climate Change
  • Talk Radio News
  • Things I learned
  • Talk Stations
  • Caller Etiquette
  • Talk Radio Trinity
  • Radios & Reception
  • People Index
  • People Articles
  • Archives
  • Ratings Archive
  • Audio Vault
  • Talk Radio Audio
  • Steve Bryant
  • Other Audio
  • Funny Images
  • Funny Video
  • Funny Text
  • Funny Audio
  • RadioSpoof
  • Site Map
  • About PhillyTalk
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal ©
  • Link With Us
  • Site Stats
  • Contact

NASA blunder on climate change

Details
Category: Global Warming

Red faces at NASA over climate change blunder

Originally added August 14, 2007 

From thestar.com - Story Link

Excerpts:

Agency roasted after Toronto blogger spots `hot years' data fumble
Aug 14, 2007 04:30 AM by DANIEL DALE

In the United States, the calendar year 1998 ranked as the hottest of them all – until someone checked the math.

After a Toronto skeptic tipped NASA this month to one flaw in its climate calculations, the U.S. agency ordered a full data review.

Days later, it put out a revised list of all-time hottest years. The Dust Bowl year of 1934 now ranks as hottest ever in the U.S. – not 1998.

More significantly, the agency reduced the mean U.S. "temperature anomalies" for the years 2000 to 2006 by 0.15 degrees Celsius.

A former mining executive who runs the blog ClimateAudit.org, McIntyre, 59, earned attention in 2003 when he put out data challenging the so-called "hockey stick" graph depicting a spike in global temperatures.

This time, he sifted NASA's use of temperature anomalies, which measure how much warmer or colder a place is at a given time compared with its 30-year average.

Puzzled by a bizarre "jump" in the U.S. anomalies from 1999 to 2000, McIntyre discovered the data after 1999 wasn't being fractionally adjusted to allow for the times of day that readings were taken or the locations of the monitoring stations.

McIntyre emailed his finding to NASA's Goddard Institute, triggering the data review.

"They moved pretty fast on this," McIntyre said. "There must have been some long faces."

Pin It
Previous article: 1922 warming before Al Gore Prev Next article: Schools must warn of Gore climate film bias Next
© 1994 - 2025 PhillyTalk.com
Back To Top
Twitter